Archive for July, 2005

No surprise, Justice O’Connor resigns, everyone sets out lawn chairs from which to examine the horizon

Friday, July 1st, 2005

And now Justice O’Connor has stepped down, which is a day we’ve been dreading for the past 5 years. A not a day. Is a huge chasm instead opening in the earth, from which could crawl what monster from the deep. I’d say no there was the cleft and the woman was the swing vote by which we’ve been dangling for these five long years, hoping the roots of the tree would hold, not release, and down we’d go. Except she’s not a tree that has given out.

I’ve wondered how it must feel to be Sandra O’Connor, have wondered how it must have felt to be Sandra O’Connor for the past five years. 75 years of age. Appointed 24 years ago. Her husband’s been ill. Has she been tired. Seems to me she would have had to be exhausted, except that she had this monumental responsibility to fill the past five years, millions of people expecting and urging her to get up in the morning and keep fulfilling her job. To be that wanted, that needed, by so many, I’ve attempted to fathom. Which is difficult because I can only try to approach it on the human level, not the professional. I’ve imagined O’Connor waking up every morning, another day of should I resign, shouldn’t I resign, every day beginning tenuous, on the edge, the great question mark looming, and each night the last thought being should I resign, ,shouldn’t I resign, one day I shall have to, will have to decide soon. Have imagined her where-ever, however she eats her breakfast, in the kitchen, in a breakfast room, over tile, over Formica, over wood, chewing toast or bagel or muffin, speaking with her husband or trusted confidant, what she must say in private about being that branch by which millions were hanging. Did she say I’m tired. How many conversations in which she said, I have to go on, they’re depending on me, if I step down there goes the swing vote on constitutional rights and freedoms and I plunge, by resigning, us all firmly in the dark ages. Other mornings she may have said, no, I’ve done all I can and more than reasonably expected. It’s not my fault. I can’t accept that kind of responsibility. If we plunge into the dark ages it’s not my doing.

I’ve imagined these conversations taking place nearly every day, some times abbreviated, terse, sometimes lengthy.

I spent my teen years in the Dominionist-headed south, despite its pro-life preoccupations, treated to the going philosophy that you are certainly less than expendable. “How so?” I wondered. Perhaps expendable in the way that no one is invulnerable. But it’s not like if you evaporate than the universe materializes a clone to carry on in your place. Everything relative to the long-run Earth, then sure, yeah, expendable. But seemed one of those controlling one-liners meant to nip argument in the bud, to deflate, disempower, humiliate. Fed out to no one in specific except all who’d been primed to understand it as true. You are expendable. Behave as one who is expendable. Responsibly expendable, of course. But expendable.

Have wondered what it must feel like to be one who has been inexpendable. The wrestling of fates. 75 years of age, with an ailing husband. The fate that was the ultimately undeniable, personally. Six years ago she would have been looking down the road leading to today’s chasm, the cleft already visible and waiting. For the past five years she must have looked down that shortening road and perhaps thought if I keep on walking then another road may open in the meanwhile which will alleviate the wrestling of fates. So keep on walking. It could happen.

But it didn’t.

The news reports this moment has been awaited, and yet there was surprise.

I don’t know how there could have been surprise.

I know there will be some with hope now for a moderate response from Bush in his replacement appointment. Or some will say they hope for such. Though no one has expected a moderate response from Bush the past five years. The plasma and breath of hope the past five years has proved its utility to not be a last ditch, expectant trust that the clouds may disperse and the morning sun rise bright, fresh and birds singing. No, hope is instead a simple acknowledgment that though we are certain such-and-such shall happen there is always instead the chance that California will fall off into the ocean during the night and a huge tsunami arise that takes out a majority of the world’s population and those of us remaining will be preoccupied with different concerns. You can’t with absolute certainty say that it will not happen. Sure, California looks like it’s here to stay for a tremulous while, but it could decide during the night to surprise everyone and take a dive, ironing out the rift between the blue and red in its own way.

Senator Reid says, “With this nomination, the president should choose to unite the country, not divide it.”

Bush is out the gate saying already he hopes for a “dignified” confirmation and he wants his choice to have “fair treatment, a fair hearing, and a fair vote.”

Which means another bitter fight, Bush having no interest in uniting the country except by force. His last thoughts before he goes to sleep are that he’s the 21st century global corporate Abe Lincoln with his whole tenure his Gettysburg Address that none perish in vain except for the sake of freedom. If he just keeps saying it then it will be fact, be true, much like hope’s utility being the acknowledgment that though the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, this could by five p.m. Eastern Daylight Time no longer be the case. Could happen. Indeed, we think we know the sun but it could just suddenly divulge a new physical law of which we’ve been unaware and go boom, time up.

Unauthorized cover #4 - Helter Skelter

Saturday, July 2nd, 2005

Been a while since I’ve posted one of the unauthorized covers. This one is Helter Skelter.

As with the rest. I’m the vocal. Marty’s the music and production but I helped produce all of these though, which was a hell a lot of fun. Again, mid 90s.

Links to the others are under the “music” category.

Leonard Peltier call to action

Saturday, July 2nd, 2005

FROM THE Leonard Peltier Defense Committee HEADQUARTERS

CALL TO ACTION FOR LEONARD PELTIER, #89637-132

This morning, July 1, 2005, Cyrus Peltier, grandson of Leonard went to
visit his grandpa as he has for the last 13 years. He was stopped at
the visiting area and was told, “He’s gone”. Upon questioning, he was
told that Leonard was transferred and after further inquiries, finally
found out that Leonard has been moved to USP Terre Haute, Indiana. At
this time, Leonard is in the hole and is being kept there indefinitely.
NOW IS THE TIME TO ACT.

It is basic procedure to keep transferred inmates in the hole while
processing takes place, however we do not know how long that will take.
We are asking anyone and everyone to get on the phones and get out their
pens and paper. Let’s flood the telephones with calls regarding
Leonard! Let’s stuff their mailboxes with letters about Leonard! Urge
the prison to allow Leonard to contact his family as soon as possible.
Ask how he is, ask where to write, ask if he’s OK, ask about his health,
his privileges (phones, letters, visits, religious rights, ability to
paint, etc.) inquire as to his safety-anything-just keep calling and let
the prison know that the entire world is watching and is concerned about
Leonard. Please be sure to be courteous and professional, as we do not
wish to complicate Leonard’s situation.

The Leonard Peltier Defense Committee, Peltier Legal Team and Leonard’s
family are working hard to ensure Leonard’s safety and we will keep you
informed as things develop.

Mitakuye Oyasin.

LPDC, Inc

USP Terre Haute
U.S. Penitentiary
4700 Bureau Road South
Terre Haute, IN 47802
Phone-812-244-4400
Fax—-812-244-4789
THP/EXECASSISTANT@BOP.GOV

Federal Bureau of Prisons
320 First Street NW
Washington, DC 20534
202-307-3198
info@bop.gov

The rest of the story of our July 4th freedom happy holiday

Saturday, July 2nd, 2005

Paul Harvey. “Not dead yet!” No, not Paul Harvey, who has a 10 year, $100 million contract with Disney/ABC Radio Networks, syndicated to 1000 radio stations, with listeners of about 18,000,000. “Not dead yet!” Paul Harvey, who my guess is would be all for capital punishment for flag burners, but has probably a few times in his life gotten too cozy with his love of genocidal porn to contain himself and shot a wad on the stars and stripes. Now he’s said as much himself. Don’t look for Playboy and Hustler tucked away in the drawer of his nightstand. For Harvey, it’s photos of bar-b-qued flesh and a flag smelling juicy of shit, piss, vomit and semen. Sound of missiles blighting the skies with their payload and Harvey delivers his.

A transcript of Harvey’s June 23rd show is at The Chicago Tribune’s, Eric Zorn’s notebook:

After the attack on Pearl Harbor, Winston Churchill said that the American people…he said, the American people, he said, and this is a direct quote, “We didn’t come this far because we are made of sugar candy.”

That was his response to the attack on Pearl Harbor. That we didn’t come this far because we are made of sugar candy.

And that reminder was taken seriously. And we proceeded to develop and deliver the bomb, even though roughly 150,000 men, women and children perished in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. With a single blow, World War II was over.

Following New York, Sept. 11, Winston Churchill was not here to remind us that we didn’t come this far because we’re made of sugar candy.

So, following the New York disaster, we mustered our humanity.

We gave old pals a pass, even though men and money from Saudi Arabia were largely responsible for the devastation of New York and Pennsylvania and our Pentagon.

We called Saudi Arabians our partners against terrorism and we sent men with rifles into Afghanistan and Iraq, and we kept our best weapons in our silos.

Even now we’re standing there dying, daring to do nothing decisive, because we’ve declared ourselves to be better than our terrorist enemies — more moral, more civilized.

Our image is at stake, we insist.

But we didn’t come this far because we’re made of sugar candy.

Once upon a time, we elbowed our way onto and into this continent by giving small pox infected blankets to native Americans.

Yes, that was biological warfare!

And we used every other weapon we could get our hands on to grab this land from whomever. And we grew prosperous.

And, yes, we greased the skids with the sweat of slaves.

And so it goes with most nation states, which, feeling guilty about their savage pasts, eventually civilize themselves out of business and wind up invaded, and ultimately dominated by the lean, hungry and up and coming who are not made of sugar candy.

Zorn notes that Harvey prefaced this frank indulgence with the warning that he’d been “choking” on something for several weeks and he was going to “get it up and get it out for what it’s worth”.

Likes his fast, savage, uncivilized, this “not made of sugar candy ” Harvey who since 1946 has been fucking eardrums ’till they bleed with his “The Other Side of the Story” patriot candy shlock. And the excruciating thing is the public has loved it. Oooh, that laughable, lovable Paul Harvey who in his plain-spoken, Tulsa way tells it like it is for everybody. We’re repeatedly assured of that. His is the Amerikan voice. This Paul Harvey.

I remember when I was a child of about 12 or so and first heard Paul Harvey.

I hated him.

He was Something Wicked This Way Comes leering from behind the closet door, gumdrops in his right pocket and a lovin’ choke-hold in his left.

I understood why so many people adored the duplicitous plain-speech of Paul Harvey.

Mike Thomas at Salon.com notes Garrison Keiller doesn’t care for Paul Harvey either.

A few years ago, in the pages of Chicago magazine, radio storyteller Garrison Keillor fondly recalled his run-in with Harvey at a “stuffed-shirt” dinner in Chicago. “When the salad plates were whisked away and the entree brought in, he leaned over toward me and said, ‘Page … 2,’ just like he does on the radio,” Keillor wrote. “In fact, Mr. Harvey was exactly as he is on the radio. He read me a number of stories from a script in his pocket, most of them about ordinary Americans and their struggle to deregulate industry and give large corporations the freedom to do good in the world, and during all of this, he sold me a tin of liver pills and a utensil that dices, slices, chops, minces and prunes.”

Paul Harvey is at heart a blogger commentator:

“I don’t think of myself as a profound journalist,” he told Larry King. “I think of myself as a professional parade watcher who can’t wait to get out of bed every morning and rush down to the teletypes and pan for gold.” Introspecting further, he declared, seasoned pro to seasoned pro, “I think all of us, if we’re worth our salt, we’re for certain things and we’re against certain things. And it seems more honest to me to call it ‘Paul Harvey News and Comment’ and just let it all hang out. Because each of us expresses comment if only by what we read and what we toss in the wastebasket.”

Thing is, Paul Harvey is for once telling it like it is. At 86 years-of-age he apparently decided it was time for a little honesty. That the prosperity of War Lord Amerika and corporate giants and Sam Walton and his family comes at a steep price. One that people like Paul Harvey are unflinchingly ready to make everyone else pay, as are I suspect most Amerikans, deep in their prosperity-hungry, warlord hearts.

Amerika, a nation of warlords. You’d never guess it, the way they heart middle-class family values. July 4th picnic offerings on the red-checked tablecloth: mom, the flag, apple pie, pro-life, anti-social support. “You’ll have to pry my dime out of my red-knuckled hands unless you have a slavery-made Wal-mart worthless holiday knick-knack for the old curio shelf” Amerika.

Amerika loves its Sam Waltons for their ruthless drive. Winner gets all is the way Amerika works. Because they love a greedy head-banging warlord. The strength to do what it takes at the price of whomever must bite the dust along the way. It is a fundamental truth about the majority of Amerikans.

And if they tsk-tsk over Paul Harvey’s honest, ruthless, “I love genocide” commentary, it will only be because he laid the cards out straight in a culture where honesty may be lauded but do-what-it-takes two-faced slyness is the expected and what’s respected. Say one thing, do another.

Paul Harvey, in his broadcast, speaks with a thinner voice than he used to. The fading voice of one who’s lived nearly nine decades. But when he speaks of the use of pox-infected blankets and nuclear weapons his voice is not one of reflective regret of years, and compassion for the nameless, faceless humanity buried by power, instead it is one of resolution. The determination that whatever may get in the way of your commercial sponsors, you fuck-em-over, and you fuck-em-over good, for once and for all with as much collateral damage as possible.

Push a nuclear button to clear the plate. That’s “Wipe out”, Paul Harvey style.

* * * * *

The Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting people remind us that Disney refused to distribute Michael Moore’s “Fahrenheit 911″, their excuse being, “Disney caters to families of all political stripes and believes Mr. Moore’s film…could alienate many.” They recommend that one writes Disney to ask “why it finds Paul Harvey’s nostalgia for slavery and genocide and his calls for nuclear war acceptable, but deemed Michael Moore’s film unacceptable.”

Another happy July 4th posting - courtesy of the “objective” Ayn Rand Institute

Sunday, July 3rd, 2005

The Ayn Rand Institute bills itself as “the center for the advancement of objectivism”, seeking to advance the principles of reason, rational self-interest, individual rights and free-market capitalism, spearheading a “cultural renaissance” that will reverse the anti-reason, anti-individualism, anti-freedom, anti-capitalist trends in today’s culture. The major battleground in this fight for reason and capitalism is the educational institutions—high schools, and above all, the universities, where students learn the ideas that shape their lives.

Objective standing from where? In the eyes of the Ayn Rand institute, “civilization” equals European.

No Apology to Indians
Monday, June 27, 2005
By: Thomas Bowden

Dear Editor:

The Senate Committee on Indian Affairs is debating whether the United
States should formally apologize to Indians for a “long history of
official depredations and ill-conceived policies.” This proposal should be
rejected.

Before Europeans arrived, the scattered tribes occupying North America
lived in abject poverty, ignorance, and superstition–not due to any
racial inferiority, but because that is how all mankind starts out
(Europeans included). The transfer of Western civilization to this
continent was one of the great cultural gifts in recorded history,
affording Indians almost effortless access to centuries of European
accomplishments in philosophy, science, technology, and government. As a
result, today’s Indians enjoy a capacity for generating health, wealth,
and happiness that their Stone Age ancestors could never have conceived.

From a historical perspective, the proper response to such a gift is not
resentment but gratitude. America’s policies toward the Indians were
generally benign, aimed at protecting them from undeserved harm while
providing significant material support and encouragement to become
civilized. When those policies erred, it was usually by treating Indians
collectively, as “nations” entitled to permanent occupancy of
semi-sovereign reservations. Instead, Indians should have been treated as
individuals deserving full and equal American citizenship in exchange for
embracing individual rights, including private ownership of land.

If the United States government were demanding that Indians apologize for
the frontier terrorism of their ancestors, as if living members of a
particular race could be guilty of their forebears’ misdeeds, the demand
would (properly) be rejected as racist. For the same reason, American
Indians should refuse to be regarded as a race of helpless victims
entitled to a collective apology from their fellow citizens.

Thomas A. Bowden
Ayn Rand Institute

Even a modicum of research would have dispelled these “stone age colored peoples lived in poverty and superstitious ignorance” myths.

For a different perspective, try this on for size. Ioway tribal representatives made a visit to Europe 1841-1845 and were not overly impressed by what they saw.

Certain sights shocked Ioway sensibilities. Among them were the coal mines, where they saw women and children used as beasts of burden to pull carts on their hands and knees through tunnels. Crowded prisons horrified and alarmed them. The grandeur of York Cathedral represented the greatness of civilization, but the poverty of many London, Birmingham and York inhabitants began to distress them seriously. When they questioned Catlin about the reasons for so many poor people, the subject of taxes and debts arose. The latter was understood, but not the result, the incarceration of debtors in prison for nonpayment. They reasoned that such a punishment only deprived the mother and children of a man to supply food and shelter, and they could see no reason for it. The poorhouses were explained as a means of taking care of such indigents, but the Ioways merely shook their heads.”

The Ioway, Washkamonya, kept an anthropological diary during the trip, studying the English and French.

Jim’s (Washkamonya) notebook now contained a sizable list of figures that argued against the benefits of civilization. He had compiled figures on the annual consumption of spirits. His numbers, carefully copied from his daily “London Times”, said that 29,200,000 gallons were sold annually in Great Britain and Ireland and that 24,000,000 pounds were spent to buy that amount. He then added a note that 50,000 drunkards died each year, and one-half of the insanity, two-thirds of the pauperism, and three-fourths of the crime were the consequences of its use.

“This,” Jim said, “was one of the best things he had for his notebook,” thinking of the missionaries at home as well as those who visited the Ioways in London. He said, “those blackcoats were always talking so much about the Indians getting drunk, that it would be a good thing for him to have these figures to show, and that he intended to have Catlin write these figures at the end of the tour, that fourteen Ioway Indians were one year in England and never drank any of this firewater, and were never drink in that time…

Washkamonya took note of how the Queen was being asked to promote laws to protect the daughters of the poor against being induced to prostitution. Washkamonya procured an article which he entered into his notebook for the purpose of taking home and showing the “black coats” who “extolled the innate virtue of white women and decried the lack of it in their red-skinned sisters. Side by side in Jim’s book were the number of churches, the number of ministers, and the number of crimes of all types that were committed in the country.”

The Ioway were more impressed with the French, though alarmed at the amount of attention paid to dogs over children.

A visit to the Foundling Hospital opened Jim’s notebook again, and he added that, of 26,000 children born in Paris during the past year, 9,000 were illegitimate. The knowledge that there was no one, not even a distant uncle, who cared enough to provide for even one little one, put more black marks on the growing list of French frailties. At this point the doctor asked why the thousands of ladies in Paris, who cared so much for little dogs, could not be induced to care for these little children. At this, the comparative gap between the English and French societies grew slim indeed. Catlin declared at this time that Jim’s notebook would soon be filled with information to ‘teach to the cruel and relentless Indians” the benefits of civilization.

The Ayn Rand Institute above states, “The transfer of Western civilization to this continent was one of the great cultural gifts in recorded history, affording Indians almost effortless access to centuries of European accomplishments in philosophy, science, technology, and government. As a result, today’s Indians enjoy a capacity for generating health, wealth, and happiness that their Stone Age ancestors could never have conceived.”

What? Millions killed. Millions dead of smallpox and disease. Even the “Adams’ Family Values” movie has it over the Ayn Rand Institute, when Wednesday, asked to portray a convivial Pocahontas, turns to the audience and makes a speech on how the whites live as opposed to American Indians forced onto reservations, living in trailer homes, lists a litany of ills forced on the American Indian nations by Euro-Americans and finishes with, “And for all these reasons, I have decided to scalp you and burn your village to the ground”, and proceeds to torch the Thanksgiving theater of the pilgrims.

Poverty and starvation were the gifts to the First Nations from Anglo-American civilization.

Now, for a fun treat, compare Washkamonya’s anthropological surveys with those of progressive bloggers. Washkamonya paid strenuous attention to what he observed and recorded it all with the intention of pointing out to the “blackcoats” their hypocrisy. To no avail. The Ioway, returning home, began to awake fully to how non-negotiable their situation was.

Progressive, liberal, Democrat bloggers dash about recording the hypocrisy of the Neocons, the Dominionists. I know, I do it as well. We do as Washkamonya did. We take our findings back to the “blackcoats” and we say, “See, see, I have the figures here. What you’re saying is wrong. Look to your own way of doing things for corruption and destitution of spirit. You are forcing upon us a way of doing things we do not want. It does not work, we see that. And it won’t work for us. Stop. We don’t want it.”

But the blackcoats won’t listen. They weren’t listening in 1845. They won’t listen now.

There is no reasoning with blackcoats.

Happy July 4th.

I who have nothing

Sunday, July 3rd, 2005

Pandagon is asking where the original voice in pop music has gone.

I don’t know what Pandagon’s tastes are, but I have a taste for this.

Some bonafide, real music. My husband chides and says the Unauthorized Covers I’ve been posting are real. And they are. But how about a real VOICE. Marty has been in the studio with 6 foot 8 Mike Geier of Kingsized for the past some months, producing. CDs not done and mastered and out yet, they’ve still got some more songs to record, but I’m going to give a couple of previews, because I love Geier’s voice and the arrangements and because it’s kind of deranged. Deranged in that subtle kind of way that sneaks up on your subconscious with forks and spoons and feeds on you as much as you feed on it. Tom Waites blows through the front door, about as insidious as a hurricane. And I say that adoring Tom Waites. Mike Geier smooth talks his way up the back steps and takes you by surprise by the refrigerator.

I who have nothing.

I’ll post another tune tomorrow or the next day.

And here’s his Kingsized website. They were in Germany in February doing shows and are going back in the fall.

My John Birch story

Monday, July 4th, 2005

Possibly a bit too much frankness follows but I guess it’s all right after all this time.

* * * * * * * *

So there I was, somewhere around 1981 and I was probably a couple of months sober via AA. I wasn’t in tip-top shape. Maybe the time I drank on Antabuse had something to do with it but for a full year after getting sober my hands shook so badly that I got in the habit of anticipating money I would need and putting it and ID in an easy to access pocket because the tremor was obvious if I tried to open my wallet and handle cash. In other words, I tried to minimize required hand movements in public, any transaction where there would be a focus on my hands, because I was embarrassed by the shakes.

The previous summer, when I’d landed in the hospital after a several week long binge (I never ate while on a binge) at the end of which I’d vainly tried, while drunk, to slice my wrists (realized as soon as I shattered the glass on the counter top and applied it that I’d drunkenly chosen the wrong type, a regular glass would have done some damage but this was a crinkle kind of glass that crumbled as it dug), I had thrown myself into studying the paintings of Magritte and Ernst, convinced somehow that they would save me. In AA, a couple of months sober, I realized how insane that was. 20 plus years later I don’t think it was a crazy way to wrestle with the world. It just wasn’t going to get me sober.

I give a bit of that history just to highlight how vulnerable the fresh AA person is and likely is to be for a while. AA has its good points and its bad. For me, the good points outweighed the bad while I was getting sober.

It’s advised that one choose a sponsor, someone with long term sobriety who you can call when the urge to drink is strong and you’re thinking you can’t make it another second. Someone who can help you be mindful of and stick to the principles and steps. This is a reason it’s a program of principles rather than personalities, because people are a frail lot and AA does try to set it up for a person to be guided and protected by principles. So you don’t end up being taken captive or hoodwinked by personalities who take principles and bond to them their private program for sobriety which has everything to do with how they think the world should be run, how they think you should live, and nothing to do with just not taking that first drink.

While everything was still a jumbled mush of coffee-colored shadows and anemic light, I chose my sponsor. I forget how many years my sponsor was sober. A woman in her late 40s or early 50s. It wasn’t the 24 or so years I now have. But it was more than ten years. She was a woman with a strong, almost strident personality whose facade confessed no hesitation or self-doubts. She usually didn’t go to the meeting house where I’d landed, but there she was one morning when I was about two weeks without a drink and listening to her I knew immediately, this would be my sponsor. Her voice had the deep seductive allure and salesman conviction of those bodyless spirits on television commercials who make their living selling you cars that cost the price of a home. She looked straight in the eyes without flinching. If anyone tried to say, ” I have to drink because such-and-such has happened and I can’t handle it,” she was quick and sharp with the knife cutting away the excuse. “No, there are no excuses, you just don’t take the first drink. Drinking has no relation to anything in your life. No relation to anything in your life.” She was calloused and without pity in that way, as a hard-line, long-term AAer is expected to be, but compassionate as well, quick to amend with all that you could do and must do to take care of yourself and get through the minute-by-minute. There was no wavering to her, she permitted no ifs or buts, and some people didn’t like her for it. But I needed someone who wouldn’t waver, who had that calm alluring voice, who had bright red hair red lipstick red nails, who could take a room by silent storm just through sense of presence. Her big thing was not to remind you to say “No, I can’t take a drink” but to instead say, “Yes, I’m sober.” Cut out the no’s, she said. Phrase everything in your brain to be a yes. And suspecting this and some of her firey temperament would help perhaps get me through, I said, “Will you be my sponsor?” and she said yes.

She later confessed she’d had her doubts about me but that may be also why she said yes. Because I was a challenge, perhaps, and because we made a peculiar looking pair. She was a “housewife” and didn’t work but when you talked to her or heard her you never thought “wife” and it never occurred to you she may have ever cooked a roast. And I needed someone like that because older women who’d had children, at least the ones I’d met, seemed to be more accepting of gray rooms and extenuating circumstances and less likely to say bullshit. Well, they didn’t. They simply didn’t say, “That’s bullshit”, their upbringing and religion didn’t allow it, and I needed someone who wasn’t afraid to say, “That’s bullshit.” Also, these older women were friendly enough but I got the impression preferred me on the other side of the room. In 1982 there were more young women in AA than there had been just two years previously, but we were still rather rare. And there weren’t many young women who’d been on the road for years, who were punk, who dressed in leather and torn clothing not as a weekend fashion statement but a fundamental way of life, an outlook on the world. In fact, at the meeting places I attended, I was the only one. My sponsor later said she thought I didn’t have much of a chance of getting sober but she took me on anyway.

I write all this because there was a great side to my sponsor as well as a darker side. And it wouldn’t be fair to not include the great side, that saw me through those first months of hellish days and nights.

The dark side later split us up. Hard. In an ugly way. But I was sober.

We probably looked a questionable pair, my sponsor and I. She, a middle-aged, slightly heavy woman with red hair, a forceful personality but thoroughly upper middle class. Me in my torn jeans and leather cap and decaying leather jacket and shaking hands and hardly a dime in my pocket most of the time.

Where my sponsor fucked up later was deciding what was best for me, what she wanted me to be, telling me how I should and shouldn’t live, what books I should and shouldn’t read, trying to dictate politics. She started to control, and it surprised me. And we split up. I said you’ve way overstepped boundaries and we never spoke again. But she wasn’t like that at the beginning. The fears she had may have been there early on and I’d overlooked them, but in the beginning there was no mention of politics. She wasn’t yet carrying a gun. And because she’d accepted me as someone to sponsor I had painted her in my mind as being sympathetic with my sympathies. Why else would she be my sponsor? I was invited to her home where there was a big bowl of expensive jelly beans on the table and I learned they were Reaganites but AA is not about politics, it’s about principles. There are no politics in AA. You ignore that kind of thing.

So I’m several months sober. My sponsor and I used to go get something to eat some times after meetings, often with others. We were probably, that day, on our way after a meeting to such a place where I’d often just get a cup of coffee as I couldn’t afford a dine-out meal, and sometimes my sponsor would be kind enough to get me something to eat. She asked me if I minded if we stopped at a bookstore first. I said sure–after all her car, she was driving so like I was going to say no. I wondered why she asked because why ask someone who loved books if they minded stopping at a book store. And there was a hint of mystery in that tenor alluring, Jaguar salesman voice of hers. A hint of mystery in her manner, but there had been increasingly a hint of mystery in her manner. She would say something provocative and I would question it and she would smile and say we could talk about it later, when I had more sobriety under my belt.

I was used to only being around musicians for years and I bumped into a lot of other lifestyles in AA. Homeless lifestyles on the south side of town and totally glass house lifestyles like my sponsor had in one of the really better-heeled suburbs. I was thinking about how I’d bumped into a lot of different lifestyles, and was enjoying getting those glimpses, as she swung her car into a small and blank empty parking lot in front of a two-story 50s red brick building, the bottom floor occupied by a dusty let-us-do-your-taxes office and an office supply store that was still in business but looked like no one had been home for 15 years.

Between the tax office and the office supply store was a door that one would never have noticed, though right there in plain sight. Where’s the book store I thought. We entered through that door directly onto a flight of wooden steps that was less reminiscent of film noire than brown paper wrapped packages. As we went up the stairs I thought what is this. At the top were two doors, one to the left and one to the right. I’m not a porno kind of person and I fully expected her to walk me into some kind of otherworldly Story of O sex shop with no pink frilly “Your first time, try this unaggressive bit of fun.” Because of the increasing sense of something secret.

I wasn’t the most trusting person in the world. I was worried. Things didn’t feel up-and-up right. I didn’t want my relationship with my sponsor to end because she had decided it was time to introduce me to bondage sex utensils, when I wasn’t interested. I wanted her voice to sell me sobriety, nothing more.

We entered through that door into an old room that hadn’t seen paint in a while but was filled with light from the open window blinds. It looked like a damned library. And there, behind what looked like a library desk, sat a woman in her late 50s or early 60s who looked just like a librarian from a hack 60s television show with the librarian glasses and librarian expression. She gave me a startled, worried look, like she was ready to pick up the phone and call the police. Then she saw my sponsor and her face transitioned into a smile and she exulted hi where have you been, I haven’t seen you in a while. They knew each other well. They were talking weekend parties, and my sponsor was saying she hadn’t been able to make it to such-and-such party. My sponsor said she was going to chat a bit, and either she said why don’t you look around or I said I’ m going to look around. I don’t remember. Her eyes followed me as I went into the old library shelves. She watched me as I looked around.

Whose portrait was on the wall just inside the door? I don’t remember. But it was some author’s portrait and that had reassured me as whoever it was was a well-known author, and I thought, gee, wonder why I’ve never heard of this bookstore, because I knew them all at that time, every bookstore in the city and almost every weekend was searching through the stacks in the used bookstores.

There wasn’t a lot of choice of reading material actually. Curious, I thought, a bookstore without much of a choice of reading material. I was still kind of fuzzy at the edges and it slowly occurred to me there was a lot of Ayn Rand, lots of copies of Ayn Rand. Atlas Shrugged, the Fountainhead.

And some book on something called the tri-lateral commission. Book with a vaguely political cover. I picked it up and glanced through it. Hmmm, what was this. Names like William Buckley. I looked at the other political-looking books. Slim volumes.

Everything political I’d read to date had been mainly on fascism. I had spent several years reading almost every book on fascism and its rise and its workings Germany and Italy and in central and south america that I could get my hands on. Some books that never made their way back to the library as, being on the road, the previous few years I had been losing them left and right in motel rooms all across the southeast, arriving at gigs sober enough to read, and leaving several days later totally not sober and unaware I’d brought along any books at all and not remembering I had for a couple weeks.

These were little slim books with the kind of covers I would never have picked up. But that’s all there was and I browsed through.

And I realized.

At some point.

My sponsor had spirited me into a John Birch bookstore.

I looked back up at the portrait of the well-known author and realized, oh fuck, that’s a portrait of John Birch to the right of the author, 3 by 4 foot big on the wall.

My god, what in the hell was I doing in a John Birch bookstore.

I tried not to look surprised, my sponsor’s eyes on me, watching.

I thought over all our conversations and wondered just who my sponsor thought I was.

But she knew what my politics were or she wouldn’t have been eyeing me with such curiosity, watching for my reaction.

The librarian-bookshop keeper watching me out of the corner of her eye.

Betray no expression, I figured that was the thing to do. This was my sponsor, the woman I’d for several months been calling at 3 am in the morning saying, “Tell me what I need to do to stay sober”, and she had done it and I had stayed sober, except for one slip after the first month.

I had no fucking clue what was up.

They continued to chit-chat, eyeing me as I flipped through the books. My sponsor didn’t take a look at a single one. She only stood and spoke with the shopkeeper.

Well, I figured I would never in my life find myself in anther John Birch bookstore. So I chose out a couple of books that looked like they’d tell me a lot of what John Birchers thought. And when my sponsor said she was ready to leave I approached the librarian-bookkeeper with my books and she looked like she was trying to suppress some surprise, and my sponsor was smiling but looked like she had not expected things to go this swimmingly well, and I purchased the couple of books.

We didn’t say anything going back to the car. Then in the car she asked me, “So what did you think?” or something like that.

I said, “Interesting.”

She said something like she hadn’t expected me to buy anything.

I said something like I liked to know what people thought, so I read.

She said she knew I was the curious type.

That was all. She never said anything else about the bookstore. I never said anything about it. She never mentioned the words “John Birch”. I never mentioned them. I went home and read through the couple of Ayn Rand books (Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged) that I’d picked up in college but had never been able to get through the first few pages. I read them thoroughly, despite the bad writing, her romance novels for free-capitalists, in light of having seen how John Birchers liked her.

My sponsor had already begun getting heavy-handed and I solved the situation as I was inclined to do in those and earlier days.

I made myself unavailable. I moved out of town. I thought it and one month later we were gone. Several hours away. I told myself it was for all kinds of other reasons. But deep down I felt I’d gotten myself in a fix. Here was this sponsor who had helped me get sober and I suddenly felt uneasy around her. It was a big thing to break up with a sponsor and I didn’t know what the hell I would have told everyone. Everyone close to me was saying it was too bad I wasn’t going to be around my sponsor and I smiled and agreed, and inside I was profoundly relieved. Moving cut the strings with ease. When I had my first AA birthday I pretended to be really excited when she drove all that way to visit, and felt guilty that I would have preferred if she’d not come.

We ended up moving back to town around nine months after we’d moved away and we’d been gone long enough I thought no one was going to think it odd if I didn’t have much to do with my sponsor or ex-sponsor, whatever she was. In order to not betray the break with my sponsor, that I was avoiding her, when she called and asked why I wasn’t calling her I gave excuses. We got together several times and each time she would look at the books I was carrying (philosophy) and now tell me I shouldn’t be reading those, and tell me I’d been sober long enough she could now start talking to me about the life I was living and it was wrong. Not good for me, wasn’t going to take me places either. I told her she had overstepped her boundaries and she had no business trying to tell me how to think and how to live. She replied that she had things to tell me a little bit about that I hadn’t been prepared to hear until sober for a certain length of time. We alcoholics, she said, had evolved to a higher spiritual plateau than the rest of humankind and were preparing the world for its transition to a higher state, politically and spiritually. We were connected, we could read minds, she said. She divulged that she was in a secret group of AA’s that was invitation only, for people who had been sober at least ten years, gave the impression that it was a kind of group that introduced to some kind of mysteries, for those who made choice cut. I thought what the fuck, there aren’t supposed to be any secret AA groups, goes totally against the principles, what did she think was she was doing. Well, it wasn’t really AA, instead it was made up of people from AA, so it was just fine, she said. Coy, she admitted she was telling me just enough to keep me interested, to string me along, knowing I was the curious type. I thought what the hell kind of group is she a part of and figuring I’d long since stopped listening to her for advice, I thought I would hang a little while longer and see if I could learn something about this, what in the hell it was.

I ended up not hanging around too much longer. Things were freaky. She was now carrying a gun with a pearl handle in her purse. Self-protection against society that she now said was falling into disarray. Some weird shit happened, so odd that I don’t remember the exact sequence of events. Serendipitously, I was going out of town. When I returned, I didn’t call, and when she called I didn’t call back.

Religious Science is very strong in some areas of AA, which had been fine, but we were now in the Reagan era and the Religious Science and Think Positive creed started to sound a lot more like Republican ideology. I had cut way back on the meetings and then stopped altogether. I had other things to work on. And there were also parts of AA and its trappings that were starting to work on me in ways I didn’t like and which did leave me confused for some time afterwards as far as what was essential for sobriety what was not.

But I was sober. And I was thinking about those things only because I’d managed to stay sober at that point for a while and wasn’t white-knuckling it. The first thing I thought of when I got up in the morning wasn’t alcohol, nor was it the last thing I thought of at night. Alcohol had ceased to be an issue.

Principles not people. I got sober in spite of it all. Which is the way it’s supposed to work. That you get sober in spite of.

The elephant man

Monday, July 4th, 2005

By the time you’ve stopped not napping around them because it’s just not responsible to fall asleep and you’re afraid they might hurt themselves, then it’s dangerous to nap around them because of what they’ll do to you in your sleep. Except my husband wasn’t asleep, he was only pretending, and I was awake and ignoring the proceedings while son cackled and ran to ask me for the camera and cackled near uncontrollably some more while he took the picture and I considered was this nice of me to let our child do this to his father with an old smelly sock of his but I knew his father was wide awake so what if any business of it was it of mine.

So funny that I might not be here now if it hadn’t been an ice cube

Tuesday, July 5th, 2005

I could have died watching this last night. Real life vs. internet. I was drinking some root beer. Had a piece of ice in my mouth. I guffawed and the piece of ice went down but was just small enough that it hurt but only choked for a second. Oops. And I kept watching, laughing. I laughed even harder the second time through.

“I love Angelina Jolie! Does anyone else like Angelina Jolie? She’s got enormous lips!”

That’s what did it.

Giggling even now.

Replay it in my mind and giggle some more.

More music-the Woods Brothers-and some links and a ‘toon for The Day ahead

Tuesday, July 5th, 2005

Some music to listen to while sailing away from here via below links to blogs off yonder, courtesy of guitarist Oliver Woods of King Johnson and his brother, Chris Wood, from Medeski, Martin and Wood, recorded live at Tonic. The song is Angel Band, by the Stanley Brothers.

Angel Band.

Now, some links.

First some beautiful writing. Stonebridge has a post on Rocky Mountain Road Trips.

We took the road up Clear Creek to Winfield, which was a refurbished but still uninhabited ghost town, board buildings dark as pitch which have withstood the chilly winds upwards of a century. Plexiglass windows on the one-room school built 1880-something revealed old desks with a mannequin schoolmarm posed near the blackboard, paralyzed in front of the empty inkwell chairs. You couldn’t go in on account of the padlock on the door, so you pushed your face against the Plexiglass to see the dim interior, where momentarily you froze and died.

Moving on to politics.

Alas, A Blog on “Supreme Court Appointment: We’ve already Lost”. Arvin Hill posts on the same, “Outrage is Cheap”.

Bagnewsnotes has the pic of Bush looking like a squaredancing Nazi in swirling flag skirt. Odd NY Times photo.

Heretik with some transcription and commentary of G Bush talking about global warming and how he just doesn’t give a damn, of course. And Talkleft with links to the G8 Protest turning Confrontational.

Green Acres comes to the city

Tuesday, July 5th, 2005

Ha! You nature bloggers with your enviably scenic backyards chock full of wild flowers and exotic birds (any bird is exotic if not a pigeon) and the occasional wandering deer don’t have anything over us urban apartment dwellers any longer. Kind of. Well, ok, you do, but you go with what you’ve got. And what we, for some unknown reason, have in our back alley right now are chickens. Yes, skyscrapers tower over us from the corners. We can see home 20 minutes away. “Look there’s the skyscraper we live under, sweetie, we’re almost home.” And I’ve no clue what they’re doing behind our apartment building, but there are chickens where usually are pigeons.

Our building is a circa 1910-1920 4 and 3 story walk-up. It’s old enough that when it was first built there was once a carriage house behind, where is now a 7 story apartment building and a large garage underneath to the left. Inbetween is a fence with a slight bit of green area between. Step out our back door and one is under a fire escape and in several feet of what wants to be a fenced of New Orleans alley between us and that narrow green space. The concrete is ancient and looks like it was bombed out. There are a few small concrete block wanna be garden boxes that are set against the fence which I tried to make into gardens when we moved in but didn’t work out, too much shade and the landlord uses the area for storage and the stinky filled trash bins go back there now as some homeless had started dumping all the trash out on the sidewalk.

And now there are chickens. Walk out back and there are three chickens today. The pictures attest to their presence. What in the hell they’re doing there, I don’t know. They weren’t there yesterday.

The concrete Buddha is ours. We carry it with us everywhere and have it stationed so when we look out the kitchen window, there it is, when unobstructed by garbage bins. The small plants you see are remnants of the garden I tried to put in last year.

Reminds me of last year when a tree showed up back there.

Doesn’t take much to disorient me, it seems.

It was Spring and nature had been doing the job of watering the perhaps potential garden for a couple of days. The day after the rains I stepped out back to water the seeds planted in a couple of the concrete-block lined beds and the basil and tomato seeds in pots. I’d noticed through the kitchen window that the small holly tree planted by the woman who formerly lived in this apartment had been sheered again by something. A limb the size of a tree had already diminished it by half during the one day of snow that winter but had fortunately missed the Buddha serenely resting to its left. It’s a casting that we got about 8 years ago as a gift from a guy for whom husband had recorded a “Will you marry me, sweet valentine” song which the love-struck one had written and planned to give to his beloved on Valentines (married now with two children). Anyway, the holly tree, which was already oddly unpleasing in shape, which had been cut in half by the tree limb, was indeed even less a holly tree. Three not too large, dead, broken branches beneath it (not holly, not large or weighty enough to be the offender) and the newly sheered away part of the holly tree was nowhere in sight. It was only three feet tall now and just a few battered looking limbs aimlessly probing the air. I started picking up small broken branches. Always more small broken branches about.

Except for Homeless Bill who stored his stuff in 5 trash receptacles in one corner, and the landlord who piled up old screens and air conditioners against this and that wall, I was the only one who ventured into the back area and at the time felt rather protective of it as I was struggling with installing the admittedly pitiful potential gardens. I had this notion of helping the back lot become the New Orleans style sanctuary it had the potential for being. There is this wood louvered, green door set into a yellow wall out there that makes me think of New Orleans. The summer we moved in I would go out and sweep, weathering the mosquitoes, pick out of the “rock garden” the cigarette butts the upstairs folk and Homeless Bill tossed there. Would clean up the pigeon feathers and odd bits of trash that end up back there.

I went over to water the garden seeds in the L-shaped ragtag, concrete block, and log lined bed against the east fence looking over the entrance to the parking garage. Looked to the right. I had earlier in the week week left there for a day, in that spot, the carcass of a rubber plant before shaking the earth off its roots and throwing it out. I forget for a moment I’d thrown it out as I saw all these exposed roots sitting there. I realized the exposed roots were attached to a trunk. I realized the trunk was attached to a real live full-sized tree that had for the moment blended with an old tree overhanging that part of the bed.

What? What was tree doing there? About eight feet tall, full-bodied. Obviously happy somewhere else until recently because it had a few sprays of springtime blooms but had been homeless long enough that the leaves were shriveled and starting to dry. What in the hell was a tree doing sitting there in a bed only about a foot and a half deep. What was a full-grown tree doing sitting there, all its roots exposed for the world to see? I went to the door and called for Marty. He came and looked. “What’s that doing there?” I asked. He didn’t know. I knew he wouldn’t know but I had to ask. Despite the fact he didn’t know, I kept asking him. “Why do you keep asking me?” he asked. Because there was no one else around to ask. In the next apartment building, on the second floor, a balcony door was open above us and I could hear people enjoying a small gathering. I looked up to see them inside seated around a table. Had they been on the balcony, I would have called to them, “Did you lose something?”

Confounded, I wondered if the tree’s roots had been exposed long enough that it was already dead. Should I make an effort to try to plant this big thing, I wondered, knowing it was impossible. Did the tree think this was its new home or was this some pit stop for the tree and whatever dropped it off was going to show up in the middle of the night and carry it on to its intended home? If I impossibly tried to plant it then the giant prehistoric bird that I pictured having dropped it there would be angry with me, but really, it shouldn’t have left the tree sitting roots exposed and all.

Or the tree was some kind of thank you from the Great Garden Elf, who saw me trying once again to plant seeds, tilling the earth with fork, and in thanks it looked around, saw all the other trees were taken, and chunked this one down.

Impossible. I couldn’t plant it. That thing was big. Eight feet may not sound big but this was a big tree. “Should I water it?” I asked Marty. “Looks like it’s already almost dead to me,” he said

Still discombobulated by the tree, I backed into the kitchen and fell backward over a chair H.o.p. had put there climbing up to pluck something off a shelf.

The mystery of the how and why of the tree was never solved, which had even been tied to the fence so that it stood upright. The landlord asked me if I had for some reason brought it in. I said I had planned to ask him that. We stood and stared a long time at the tree.

I was never quite convinced that the landlord hadn’t put it there as a joke. Except that he seemed a bit put out a couple of weeks later when sawing off the many branches, whittling it down to garbage pick-up size.

At least the chickens didn’t cause me to fall over.

Chickens. There isn’t any feed sprinkled about where we can see it. Maybe there’s feed and water tucked under one of the other fire escapes, but the area is full of tiger mosquitos and we are still itching from the couple of shots we quickly took.

Dark enough back there behind the building that I had to brighten these shots considerably so you could see the chickens.

I tell myself that certainly our landlord will know about this. He’ll know the how and why of the chickens.

Duplicitous agreements

Wednesday, July 6th, 2005

At Lewis News is an article by columnist, Greg Szymanksi, Mom, Who Lost Son In Iraq, Talks About ‘Disgusting’ White House Private Meeting With Bush. The mom is Cindy Sheehan, who testified June 16th at the Downing Street Memo Hearing called by John Conyers. Ms Sheehan also spoke about the same meeting with Bush with Amy Goodman.

Ms. Sheehan experienced Bush as uncompassionate, arrogant, cold, hostile. She looked in his eyes and saw, “This is a human being totally disconnected from humanity and reality. His eyes were empty, hollow shells and he was acting like I should be proud to just be in his presence when it was my son who died for his illegal war! It was one of the most disgusting experiences I ever had and it took me almost a year to even talk about it.”

In her interview with Ms. Goodman, Ms. Sheehan said, “I was on CNN…with Larry King talking about this, and there was another mother who had met with him, and she said that she supports the war and the President, and she said he was so warm and everything and gentle and kind, and when my family and I met with him, I met a man who had no compassion in him.”

Now, I have no doubt that Bush would be arrogant, unfeeling and hostile, as that has been my experience of his voice and manner on television and everything for which he stands is toxic to the popular good, the environment and future generations.

But it’s interesting how he can be perceived so differently by two different families. To one he appeared to be gentle, warm and kind, and to the other he was arrogant and hostile, not even bothering to know the name of Ms. Sheehan’s son who was supposedly being honored.

Are there two Bushes? Or was he displaying to Ms. Sheehan the same manner as he had exhibited with the other family, and her experience of it was different. Don’t point me in the direction of a psychology magazine and study of facial expressions and what they may or may not mean. I’m more interested that you can have a manner that is perceived by half the population as genuine and by the other half as false and yet we trust actors to reliably portray expressions, and good actors seem to do so with uniform response.

The response evoked in me by Reagan’s demeanor was the opposite from many, including, for instance, my in-laws. I saw Reagan as insincere, playing the smiling, paternal father figure, neon broadcasting, “I’m such a friendly dude, you can trust me!” My in-laws saw and heard a leader they desired who was honest, sympathetic, strong.

What makes the difference? And why such a radical split in perception?

I’ve had some plays produced and they tended to evoke a response of either “I hate it” or “I love it, we need more like this.”

Some people were said to flee in a panic.

A complaint I heard often enough, which surprised me, was, people expressing that characters were so distasteful that they were entirely unsympathetic. And I mean the kind of lack of sympathy where someone would ask why should they care if they didn’t “like” a character.

What, my characters were going to have to win personality contests?

I had never had to like a character to like a story, a movie, a play, a book.

I like “Shakes the Clown” and if you look up the few online reviews there are of Shakes, one complaint you’ll read is that the character is so distasteful there is again no sympathy had by the viewer.

Anyway, this complaint surprised me, as a young writer, because I could feel complete sympathy with characters without liking them. “Oh, but of course you would,” you may be thinking. in relation to my own plays, but those who liked the plays also saw the characters as complex and honestly portrayed. They didn’t complain about not being able to feel sympathetic. They intuited and understood sympathy where a number of other people couldn’t find it as they were put off by not being able to like a character. Those who didn’t find that sympathy seemed, at least to me, to want a character who at some point, as far as I concerned, would abandon their nature and become instead a theatrical convention.

My characters received criticism also because they weren’t saved. One play was found offensive by many because the female protagonist, instead of rallying and becoming a strong survivor, sank straight to the bottom. People wanted her to turn around and win. I could understand their wanting her to do that, but it wasn’t the character. It wasn’t what the play was about.

I did at one point write a play about a character with whom the audience could be sympathetic. Based on a friend of mine with borderline personality disorder who died of AIDs. We ended up not having much to do with each other toward the end, and it tormented me, but he had an emotionally abusive side and during the last year couple years it accentuated and I was unable to finally talk to him anymore. And it was as if he was demanding it happen, that it end that way. In some ways the play was dishonest. I wrote a lot of how it had been, but then gave it a good ending where love and understanding wills out, instead of the friendship being hacked apart by some really ugly scenes and finally irreparable. At year’s end the play was written up as one of the best two new plays performed that year. A play where I’d written how I’d wished something had been, instead of the way it had actually been.

I’m not saying my writing was without flaw at all. Indeed, though the people who loved the plays tended to be passionate about them (just as those who hated them were passionate in their hatred of them), I later saw every one of them as lacking and to my husband’s dismay chucked them all.

Still, I’m talking about that split in reception. Some of us look at the faces of Reagan and Bush and feel trust and warmth, while others of us see a facade intended to curry a positive response. Those who perceive Bush as displeasing and toxic as his policies think how can anyone not see what we see, hear what we hear? This can’t be explained away as our not liking his policies and that dislike of his politics influencing our perception, because there are perfectly charming crooks.

I mentioned the other day the accepted nature of two-facedness in American society, despite its saying otherwise. And it has been a historical complaint of some cultures in their confrontation with the Euro-American, the saying one thing and doing another. I read that Americans are supposedly more honest with their facial expressions than other societies and I have to wonder at the studies because of this history. I think of what people want out of theater, movies, stories, and wonder at the accepting of what one wishes instead of what is, and what role that plays culturally in our perceptions of physical expression.

Green Acres comes to the city update

Thursday, July 7th, 2005

Third day and the chickens are still out back of the apartment building and I don’t have an explanation yet. H.o.p. has decided he wants a chicken as they are quite friendly. I don’t know if it is the nature of chickens to be friendly. The mosquitoes are fierce back there all day and even early morning. We’ve had heavy rains and just visiting a short while gives plenty of opportunity for the mosquitoes to feast. Inside, H.o.p. runs back and forth to the kitchen window waiting for the chickens to reappear from whatever corner they’ve wandered off to. “Can we bring them inside? Can we bring them inside?” No, we can’t bring them inside, but they come up to the door so readily that I suspect if I held it open for them they’d march right through. Right up there in the top ten list of things I never expected to have happen in my lifetime was a gaggle of chickens (is it called a gaggle?) wandering through the apartment. I ought to let them in for a few moments for that reason.

As they are there now for three days I am assuming they are a permanent installation. I fully expect to open the door tomorrow morning and find a couple of pigs and a goat.

Good Start!

Thursday, July 7th, 2005

Here’s something I did up a few years ago and am giving it a rerun here:

Every so often in the mailbox in our former neighborhood would appear one of those booklets that’s 60 or so pages of “Send me your dollars and god will send you dollars/make you well” etc. A prayer cloth (1 by 1 inch square of white cloth) was sometimes enclosed. I’m sorry I ditched the booklets when we moved because we don’t get them here. The graphic itself is from one of those booklets.